Chicks Dig Sports

Picks Week 2

2008-09-14T09:12:00.003-04:00

No real thinking went into these picks. I just went with my gut. We'll see how far that takes me!

*My picks are bolded:

Home Points Spread Away
Washington Redskins +1.5 New Orleans Saints
Jacksonville Jaguars -6.5 Buffalo Bills
Kansas City Chiefs -4.5 Oakland Raiders
Cincinnati Bengals -1.5 Tennessee Titans
Minnesota Vikings +2.5 Indianapolis Colts
St. Louis Rams +9.5 New York Giants
Carolina Panthers -3.5 Chicago Bears
Detroit Lions +3.5 Green Bay Packers
Seattle Seahawks -9.5 San Francisco 49ers
Tampa Bay Buccaneers -8.5 Atlanta Falcons
New York Jets -2.5 New England Patriots
Arizona Cardinals -7.5 Miami Dolphins
Denver Broncos +2.5 San Diego Chargers
Cleveland Browns +5.5 Pittsburgh Steelers
Dallas Cowboys -7.5 Philadelphia Eagles

Oops

2008-09-09T07:05:00.003-04:00

So, I ended up with 7 games correct. I guess when I looked last night they were including one of the games that hadn't finished yet in my number. So, I guessed wrong for both games. Crappy. The guy who won has 13 games correct. Sigh. Maybe next week.

On another note, did you happen to see Aaron Rodgers play last night? He was pretty good. A little Favre-esque at times. In fact, the Packers looked pretty good. It would be interesting if the Jets and the Packers met each other in the playoffs.

What do you think about the whole Tom Brady situation? He doesn't play any games during the pre-season and in his 2nd play of the first game of the season he's taken out by a season ending knee-injury. It's going to be a steep hill for New England to climb without Brady. Although Cassells did a pretty good job replacing Brady in their win on Sunday. It will be an interesting story to follow.

8

2008-09-08T19:46:00.002-04:00

That's the number of correct picks I have so far. After tonight's games, I could end up with 10 for the week. To put it in perspective, the person winning so far has 13 correct so far and after tonight s/he could get 15.

I am happy with my 8 (hopefully 10) because last year I didn't win any weeks, but I put up decent numbers every week and ended up in the money.

BTW, Aaron Rodgers is QB'ing the Packers tonight. He doesn't look very impressive so far. I am really torn about the Packers this year. I have been a huge fan in the past, particularly because of Brett Favre. I really don't want to cheer for them, but I do if you know what I mean. Not very eloquent I know. I guess I'll cheer for the team, but not the management. And, I'm cheering for Favre in NYJ so we'll see what the season holds.

Woohoo!

2008-09-05T12:50:00.002-04:00

I got one right! The Giants beat the Redskins 16 to 7, which means they more than covered the 4.5 spread.

Now I just have to wait until Sunday for the majority of the games.

Football - Week #1

2008-09-04T18:40:00.007-04:00

Football starts tonight! Woohoo. The hubby and I have digital cable with the sports pack so we can get our fill of all of the football games every week. As I said in an earlier post, I am in a weekly pick'em game. Last year I finished 5th overall (in the money) but didn't win any of the weeks. Each week I'm going to post my picks and then afterward I'm going to discuss what happened, how many correct I got.

So here we go. This week I did not employ any major strategy when doing my picks. I looked at the spreads and if it was a large spread e.g. the favoured team had to win by 9 points or more, I would think about whether or not I thought the team was capable of covering the spread.

Without further ado, here are my picks (the team with the blue circle beside it is the team I chose).

Home	Points Spread	Away
New York Giants 16	-4.5	Washington Redskins 7
New Orleans Saints 24	-3.5	Tampa Bay Buccaneers 20
Miami Dolphins 14	+3.5	New York Jets 20
Baltimore Ravens 17	+1.5	Cincinnati Bengals 10
Atlanta Falcons 34	+3.5	Detroit Lions 21
Philadelphia Eagles 38	-7.5	St. Louis Rams 3
Buffalo Bills 34	-0.5	Seattle Seahawks 10
Tennessee Titans 17	+3.5	Jacksonville Jaguars 10
New England Patriots 17	-16.5	Kansas City Chiefs 10
Pittsburgh Steelers 38	-7.5	Houston Texans 17
San Diego Chargers 24	-9.5	Carolina Panthers 26
Cleveland Browns 10	+5.5	Dallas Cowboys 28
San Francisco 49ers 13	+2.5	Arizona Cardinals 23
Indianapolis Colts 13	-9.5	Chicago Bears 29
Green Bay Packers 24	-3.5	Minnesota Vikings 19
Oakland Raiders 14	+3.5	Denver Broncos 41
MNF total: 49

They FINALLY Won

2008-09-02T13:04:00.004-04:00

It was high drama, coming down to the last minute of play when the University of Toronto's Varsity Blues kicked a field goal to win the game 18-17 over the Waterloo Warriors to break a 49 game losing streak. You read that correctly, prior to September 1st's game, the Blues were 0 and 49.

While this is a long losing streak, it is not the worst losing streak of all time. According to Wikipedia the longest losing streak is held by the NCAA Basketball team from the California Institute of Technology who lost a record 207 games in a row between 1996 and January 2007.

Hats off to the Blues for ending their losing skid.

Decisions Decisions

2008-08-28T15:51:00.005-04:00

I’m in a quandary. I don’t know who to cheer for this year. You see, usually I’m a Green Bay Packers fan, but they dissed my boy Brett so badly this year I don’t know if I can still cheer for them. I know what you’re thinking… a player shouldn’t be more important than the team. It’s the team that you cheer for. Ya ya, let me ask you one question… have you seen Brett Favre?! Yum. I mean, um, he’s an amazing quarterback, even if he is old.

Last year my dear hubby got me tickets to see Brett Favre and the Green Bay Packers play the NY Giants in the NFC Conference Championship game. It was a 17 hour drive, we had 3rd row, end zone tickets and it was the 3rd coldest game in the history of the league. Lambeau Field was amazing and it was the single best sporting event I’ve ever been to; even if the Packers lost. I thought I had been at Brett Favre’s last game, turned out it was just his last game as a Packer.

So, here we are. Favre is playing for the New York Jets. I don’t know if I can be a fan of the Jets. They seem so boring. They’ve been around since 1960 but they don’t seem to have any real character like the Bears, Cowboys, Packers or Steelers. I guess I’ll just start by cheering for Favre and see where it goes from there.

Are You Ready for some Football pools?

2008-08-27T15:24:00.000-04:00

For all of you Football widows out there, here’s a little information to help make sense out what it is your husband is jabbering on about at this time of year.

Or, if you’re like me and love football, but are a little overwhelmed about the types of fantasy offerings that are out there I’ve tried to make sense out of the different options. I play in a Weekly Team Pick’Em one every year and love it. I find that you don’t have to know a ton about the players or the teams – usually the person who picks based on which city they’d rather visit out of opponents wins at least one week. The great part is that because I have picked a winner it gets me more into the games.

So, below you will find some of what’s available out there and who knows, you may even decide to join one of them!

The Weekly Team Pick’Em

The Weekly Team Pick'Em is the typical office pool and I am in one every year (last year I didn’t win a week, but I came 5th overall). In this game each member of the pool must select the winner of each game that is going to be held each week of the season. The twist here is that you have to factor in the spread. A point spread is the predicted scoring difference between a game's two opponents (thank-you Yahoo! Sports). So, if Dallas is favoured to beat the Giants by 8.5 points and I select Dallas to win, in order for me to be correct Dallas has to win by more than 8.5 points. While if I had selected the Giants to win, as long as Dallas doesn’t beat them by more than 8.5 points I am correct. (Dallas could win by 3 points, but because they didn’t beat the spread of 8.5 points, anyone who selects the Giants will win.)

The point of this pool is to get the most games correct. There is usually a winner each week and then a running tally is taken over the weeks so that there will be an overall winner at the end of the season.

Draft: Live Draft vs. Auto Draft

In a fantasy game that offers a live draft, the participant will have to first join a league. Each league will have its own rules such as the number of players required at each position, the points given to passes, yards gained, touch downs etc. Each member of the leagues drafts their own team of football players. The goal is to select players that will earn you the most points. For example, if a Quarterback gets points in 5 different categories while a Running Back will earn you points in only 2 categories, it’s important that you have a high ranking QB since that’s where you’ll earn the most points.

A draft date and time will be assigned for the league; all participants should be logged in at the designated time ready to draft their team. The drafting order will be pre-determined by the League Manager. Once a player has been selected he becomes unavailable to the other teams.

This is the closest to the normal pub or office draft.

The Auto-Draft is very similar to the live draft. The difference here is that there is a tool on the website for this fantasy product that allows the participant to pre-select the players he or she wants for the team. The tool allows the participant to rank the players. There is an assigned draft date; however, no one needs to be logged in for it to run. The draft runs overnight on the assigned date. Again the draft order is pre-determined by the League Manager (the site) and just like the Live Draft one player can only be on one team. If two participants have asked for the same player whoever drafts first will get the player, the second participant will get the next highest ranked player on his or her pre-selected list.

It is important to remember that even though the site you are using may rank a player that does not mean that he will get you the most points for your particular league. It’s important to review the categories for garnering points and then select players that you think will earn the most points based on the parameters set by your League manager.

Leagues can either be Public leagues where anyone can join or Private leagues where everyone knows each other.

The Pick’Em

Another option of fantasy football games offered on the ‘Net are pick ‘em games. The basic concept is that the potential fantasy participant joins the site; he or she is then put into a league and is able to select a team from the database of players provided by the site. The site will determine how many players are required to make up a team, as well as how many players are required per position. Scoring will also be determined as Rotisserie, Straight or Head to Head.

The Salary Cap

As a twist to the regular Pick’Em game the Salary Cap forces the fantasy participant to be more selective when fielding a team. In a game with a salary cap, the players are all given specific market values based on their previous season’s performance. Each fantasy participant has a specified budget to use to select players, the catch is that the participant cannot go over the amount he or she has been given. The participant is forced to develop a strategy: to pick one or two expensive players and then fill in the rest of the roster with lesser players or to try and take a more moderate approach. The key here is for the participant to know how the team will be scored, if touch downs are more highly valued than rushing yards you may want to spend more money on a Quarterback than a Running Back.

Note that in some instances the Salary Cap is not given in monetary terms, there are instance where the player is given a fantasy ranking value and each team is given a maximum fantasy ranking value that cannot be exceeded.

Types of Scoring:

Rotisserie

This type of scoring allows for statistical averages such as the Completion Percentage to be factored into the standings. This form of scoring ranks the players in the league based on different categories for example, Touch Downs, Sacks, highest Completion Percentage, Rushing Yards, and Interceptions. If there are 10 players in a league, the available points go from 1 point for the lowest ranked participant to 10 points for the highest ranked participant per category.

The participant with the highest number of points at the end of the season will win the league.

Example

A league has Touch Downs, Sacks, highest Completion Percentage, Rushing Yards, and Interceptions as its categories. In a league of 10 participants, George Smith ranks 1st in Touch Downs, 2nd in Sacks, 2nd in Completion Percentage, 1st in Rushing Yards, and 2nd in Intereceptions. His total points will be: 10+9+9+10+9=47

Straight Points

In a league using straight points all categories are given a specific points value. For example, using this scoring approach touch downs could be worth 2 points, while rushing yards are worth 1 point or a fumble is given –1 point. This scoring system does not account for any statistic given in the form of an average. Hence, the Completion percentage will not be a category for this type of league.

The participant with the highest number of points at the end of the season will win the league.

Head to Head

Head to Head uses straight scoring, but it pits fantasy participants against each other. Different categories are given different point values the same as would be done in a game using straight scoring. The league is divided into conferences and on a weekly basis different fantasy participants’ teams play against each other. The points are tallied for that week period and whoever has the most points at the end of the week wins the week. In the standings, the win is noted under the appropriate team and the loss is noted for the other team. At the end of the season the teams with the best records for their conferences play off against each other, until one team is ultimately named the overall winner.

Good Luck!

Vote for HNIC Anthem

2008-08-25T18:26:00.005-04:00

My brother wrote an anthem for Hockey Night in Canada. Check it out and vote vote vote:

NOTE: For some reason the link only works in Mozilla/Firefox.

Elliott Friedman's a Jerk

2008-08-20T09:10:00.000-04:00

Elliot Friedman is a jerk. I know a lot of people out there would think that Elliott Friedman is a fine journalist that asks the hard-hitting questions, I just think he’s a jerk. It’s minutes after one of our Olympians comes out of the pool, he has missed a medal by a tenth of a second, it’s potentially his last swim ever and Elliott is there with the hard hitting questions – “What could you have done differently to prepare for this race? Are you going to race in 2012 and how will you prepare differently? (insert – so you actually win – here). Our athletes have answered his questions with dignity and grace, as his questions force them to relive the losing race or end their enjoyment of the 2008 Olympics because he’s forcing them to think about starting the training for the next 4 years. I can’t believe nobody has punched him, well we are Canadian, we’re all too nice for that. I sure wish he stubs his toe though.

I think the hard-hitting, cutting questions have their time and place. Right after an athlete has had their dreams dashed and is in shock is not the time for them. Particularly, these athletes. I’m pretty sure that they don’t go through extensive media training. They probably get some input as to how to stand, what to say etc, but they’re not given the training that professional athletes get. Professional athletes are trained in the art of saying lots of words, but not actually answering the questions. Our athletes are caught like deer in the headlights, thinking that all questions must be answered fully and honestly. The poor buggers. Elliott Friedman eats them for lunch. Jerk.